StackAttestTechnical TrustGet your Passport
StackAttest Passport
by Tech Steps LLC

SecAI

★★★★★

Linux Server Security

AI & Machine LearningCybersecurity
Highest verification level earned
Externally Verified
Code Verified
Runtime Verified
Production Validated
Continuously Validated (not yet verified)

SecAI is an AI-powered security monitoring platform for Linux servers. A lightweight Rust agent watches file integrity, resource usage, access attempts, and network egress across a customer's server fleet. A three-role AI pipeline -> Specialist -> Validator, QA; correlates raw signals into scored, explainable findings and drafts remediation, and nothing touches a production server without one-click human approval.

Visit SecAI (opens in a new tab)
Production URL independently verifiedDNS challenge · StackAttest
Deeper than an audit on the software itself

SOC 2 examines whether an organization followed its controls over a period, sampled by an auditor. StackAttest tests the software directly: it attempts a real cross-account read, sends real injection payloads, and checks TLS, rate limiting and dependency CVEs. Every control carries the grade of evidence behind it, and it can be re-run any day. It does not cover HR, vendors or governance, so it complements SOC 2 rather than replacing it. See how the two compare.

websitelinkedin
Latest validation result
Based on L3 runtime validation
100
Production Validated
100%Evidence Coverage
92%Validation Confidence
85%AI Consensus
Production ValidatedHighest level earned
SA-STD-1.0validated 56 days ago

The controls behind this Passport map to OWASP ASVS 5, NIST SSDF, CWE, OWASP API Security Top 10, WSTG and SLSA.

Investors & buyers: request a due-diligence view

Ask SecAI for a technical due-diligence view of this Passport, remediation liability, control posture with provenance, and the trust timeline. The founder chooses which sections and for how long. No source is ever shared.

Request access

Verified capabilities

What StackAttest checked on SecAI, and when. Anything that was not verified is not listed here, so this is a shorter list than the full control posture a due diligence view carries.

  • Encrypted connections enforced

    StackAttest connected to the production endpoint and found traffic served over TLS, with plain HTTP redirected to it.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-001

  • Browser security headers served

    The production endpoint returned the security response headers StackAttest checks for, covering transport, framing and content type handling.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-002

  • Authentication controls validated

    StackAttest sent a burst of authentication requests and the product throttled them, so credentials cannot be guessed at speed.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-003

  • Tenant isolation tested

    StackAttest held two separate accounts and tried to read one account's record from the other. The product refused.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-004

  • Server side input validation confirmed

    StackAttest sent malformed and oversized payloads to endpoints that change data, and the product rejected them on the server.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-005

  • Injection safe data access confirmed

    StackAttest sent query breaking payloads to reachable endpoints and none returned a database error, so those inputs reach the database as parameters rather than as query text.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-006

  • No credentials found in source

    StackAttest scanned the connected repository and the running app, and found no credentials, API keys or signing secrets exposed by either.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-007

  • Error responses withhold internals

    StackAttest provoked error responses from the production endpoint and none of them returned a stack trace, a database error or an internal path.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-008

  • Database lookups index backed

    StackAttest audited the live database schema and found every foreign key index backed, so lookups and joins on them stay efficient as tables grow.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-009

  • Health checks answer on a running instance

    StackAttest started the product and called its health endpoint, and the running instance answered.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-011

  • Dependency vulnerability checks completed

    StackAttest resolved the product's dependencies, audited them against a public vulnerability database, and found no known vulnerable packages.

    Verified 28 August 2026 · Evidence grade E4, runtime verified · Control SA-CORE-012

  • Production domain ownership verified

    StackAttest issued a challenge value, the owner published it on the domain this product is served from, and StackAttest read it back.

    Verified 16 August 2026 · Evidence grade E3, deterministically tested

SecAI is validated with the StackAttest Standard, deterministic evidence and a 6-model council, not a vanity score. Public profiles are anti-spam governed; trust is never sold.
Get your Passport

Reviews

★★★★★ 5.0 · 1 review Opinions from people who used SecAI, separate from the verified evidence above, and never part of the Score.
Londone Elite★★★★★Aug 23, 2026

My VPS server was under constant attack and I never knew, I kept asking my devs to improve website performance and they were like website is fully optimized and cached, then I heard of SecAI from a friend. It started block attacks in real time and everything runs smooth since then.